NCT lookup

Pull any trial record directly from ClinicalTrials.gov.

DIEP-MDS for Risk Stratification of Flap Vascular Compromise and Failure in Breast Reconstruction
DIEP-MDS for Risk Stratification of Flap Vascular Compromise and Failure in Breast Reconstruction

NCT07761390

Active Not RecruitingN/A

Sponsor: Zhuliling

Conditions: Breast Neoplasms, Breast Reconstruction, Postoperative Complications

Countries: China

This multicenter retrospective observational study will develop and validate a CTA-based quantitative risk score-the DIEP Morphological Deviation Score (DIEP-MDS)-to estimate the risk of flap-related vascular compromise and flap failure in patients undergoing DIEP flap breast reconstruction. The score will quantify the extent to which an individual's perforator anatomy deviates from normative anatomic distributions derived from a reference population of individuals without breast cancer or reconstructive surgery. Specifically, a cohort of randomly selected individuals with available CTA imaging will be used to establish population-level reference distributions for key anatomic features relevant to DIEP perforator morphology, including length, diameter, and muscle thickness. The study will determine whether greater deviation in DIEP morphology, as quantified by the DIEP-MDS, is associated with an increased risk of flap-related vascular compromise and flap failure. The score will be evaluated in an internal surgical cohort and externally validated in an independent multicenter surgical cohort. In addition, the study will pre-specify an analysis to assess whether a dual-pedicle strategy is associated with a lower risk of flap-related vascular compromise compared with a single-pedicle strategy across DIEP-MDS risk strata.

Eligibility overview

Sex: FEMALE

Age: 18 Years to 80 Years

Healthy volunteers: No

Study type: OBSERVATIONAL

Eligibility criteria
Inclusion Criteria

1. Female participants aged 18 to 80 years.
2. Reference CTA cohort: adult women without breast cancer or reconstructive surgery who had available abdominal CTA imaging of sufficient quality, obtained for reasons unrelated to breast reconstruction.
3. Internal surgical cohort: patients who underwent DIEP flap breast reconstruction at the coordinating center, with available preoperative abdominal CTA imaging and traceable perioperative and outcome data.
4. External multicenter surgical cohort: patients who underwent DIEP flap breast reconstruction at participating external centers, with available preoperative abdominal CTA imaging and traceable perioperative and outcome data.
5. For the internal and external surgical cohorts, operative records must clearly document whether a single-pedicle strategy or dual-pedicle strategy was used.

Exclusion Criteria

1. Prior abdominal flap harvest, abdominoplasty, major lower abdominal wall reconstruction, or extensive abdominal wall trauma or scarring expected to substantially alter DIEP perforator morphology.
2. Poor CTA image quality or insufficient image coverage for standardized assessment of key anatomic features relevant to DIEP perforator morphology.
3. Missing key clinical, imaging, operative, or outcome data required for the study analysis.
4. Non-DIEP abdominal flap procedures, combined flap procedures, or procedures in which DIEP flap anatomy, pedicle strategy, flap-related vascular compromise status, unplanned surgical takeback status, or flap failure status cannot be clearly determined.
5. For the reference CTA cohort, any history of breast reconstruction or abdominal wall procedures expected to substantially alter DIEP perforator morphology.
Locations (20)
  • Xiamen, Fujian, China
  • Dongguan, Guangdong, China
  • Dongguan, Guangdong, China
  • Guangzhou, Guangdong, China
  • Guangzhou, Guangdong, China
  • Guangzhou, Guangdong, China
  • Guangzhou, Guangdong, China
  • Guangzhou, Guangdong, China
  • Huizhou, Guangdong, China
  • Meizhou, Guangdong, China
  • Shantou, Guangdong, China
  • Shanwei, Guangdong, China
  • Shaoguan, Guangdong, China
  • Shenzhen, Guangdong, China
  • Zhanjiang, Guangdong, China
  • Guiyang, Guizhou, China
  • Haikou, Hainan, China
  • Changsha, Hunan, China
  • Tianjin, Tianjin Municipality, China
  • Kunming, Yunnan, China