NCT lookup
Pull any trial record directly from ClinicalTrials.gov.
A Study Comparing Shoulder Replacement Techniques For Patients With Shoulder Arthritis And An Intact Rotator Cuff
A Study Comparing Shoulder Replacement Techniques For Patients With Shoulder Arthritis And An Intact Rotator Cuff
RecruitingNA
Sponsor: Mayo Clinic
Conditions: Shoulder Arthritis
Interventions: aTSA, rTSA
Countries: United States
The purpose of this study is to determine if patients undergoing anatomic total shoulder arthroplasty (aTSA) will have improved patient reported outcome scores at 1 year compared to those undergoing reverse total shoulder arthroplasty (rTSA).
Eligibility overview
Sex: ALL
Age: 60 Years to 85 Years
Healthy volunteers: No
Study type: INTERVENTIONAL
Eligibility criteria
Inclusion Criteria * Shoulder arthritis * Intact rotator cuff * Glenoid retroversion less than 25° Exclusion Criteria * Rotator cuff insufficiency * Fracture deformity/sequelae * Severe glenoid deformity (C glenoid, severe A2, B2 glenoid) * Current or previous infection of shoulder * Previous acromion fracture (not os acromiale) * Brachial plexopathy * Axillary neuropathy * Current drug or alcohol use or dependence that, in the opinion of the site investigator, would interfere with adherence to study requirements. * Inability or unwillingness of individual or legal guardian/representative to give written informed consent. * Medical conditions that would make 2 years follow up unlikely * Non-English speaking
Locations (1)
- Rochester, Minnesota, United States