NCT lookup
Pull any trial record directly from ClinicalTrials.gov.
Screening for Prostate Cancer Using High Resolution Micro-ultrasound Versus Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging.
Screening for Prostate Cancer Using High Resolution Micro-ultrasound Versus Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging.
RecruitingPhase 3
Sponsor: University of Alberta
Conditions: Prostate Cancer Screening
Interventions: MRI, ExactVu
Countries: United States, Canada, France, Norway, Spain
The purpose of this study is to compare whether the FDA and Health Canada approved microUS is as effective as the currently used option (MRI) for imaging the prostate gland. Participants will be randomized into two groups to compare the imaging results of the current standard of care MRI and the new microUS. The study is looking to identify the most effective imaging modality to help guide whether you progress to have a prostate biopsy.
Eligibility overview
Sex: MALE
Age: 50 Years to 70 Years
Healthy volunteers: Yes
Study type: INTERVENTIONAL
Eligibility criteria
Inclusion Criteria: 1. Male sex; 2. Age 50-70; 3. PSA 3-20 and/or abnormal DRE; 4. Biopsy naïve. Exclusion Criteria: 1. Prior personal history of prostate cancer; 2. Prior prostate imaging using microUS or MRI; 3. Contraindication to microUS or MRI; 4. Testosterone replacement therapy within last 12 months; or 5. Androgen deprivation therapy within last 12 months.
Locations (9)
- Los Angeles, California, United States
- Dallas, Texas, United States
- Edmonton, Alberta, Canada
- Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
- Toronto, Ontario, Canada
- Montréal, Quebec, Canada
- Martigues, France
- Tønsberg, Norway
- Bilbao, Spain