NCT lookup

Pull any trial record directly from ClinicalTrials.gov.

Pooled Analysis of Methodologically Harmonized Pragmatic Randomized Trials of High-Dose vs. Standard-Dose Influenza Vaccine Against Severe Clinical Outcomes
Pooled Analysis of Methodologically Harmonized Pragmatic Randomized Trials of High-Dose vs. Standard-Dose Influenza Vaccine Against Severe Clinical Outcomes

NCT06506812

CompletedPhase 4

Sponsor: Tor Biering-Sørensen

Conditions: Influenza

Interventions: High-Dose Influenza Vaccine, Standard-Dose Influenza Vaccine

Countries: Denmark

This prespecified analysis will pool the datasets from two pragmatic randomized trials evaluating the relative vaccine effectiveness of high-dose vs. standard-dose influenza vaccine against severe clinical outcomes: the DANFLU-2 (A Pragmatic Randomized Trial to Evaluate the Effectiveness of High-Dose Quadrivalent Influenza Vaccine vs. Standard-Dose Quadrivalent Influenza Vaccine in Older Adults) trial and the GALFLU (Pragmatic Randomized Trial to Evaluate the Effectiveness of High-Dose Quadrivalent Influenza Vaccine vs. Standard-Dose Quadrivalent Influenza Vaccine in Adults Aged 65 to 79 Years in Galicia, Spain) trial. The purpose of the pooled analysis is to ensure adequate statistical power for evaluating relative vaccine effectiveness against severe clinical outcomes and to increase generalizability of the results by combining data from two countries.

Eligibility overview

Sex: ALL

Age: 65 Years to

Healthy volunteers: No

Study type: INTERVENTIONAL

Eligibility criteria
Inclusion Criteria:

* Pragmatic trials conducted to estimate the relative vaccine effectiveness of high-dose influenza vaccine compared with standard-dose influenza vaccine using the DANFLU-2 protocol or a protocol developed based on the DANFLU-2 protocol

Exclusion Criteria:

* Low data quality
* Influenza circulation threshold was not met in any of the study seasons
* Severe under-enrollment in all seasons
Locations (1)
  • Hellerup, Capital Region, Denmark