NCT lookup
Pull any trial record directly from ClinicalTrials.gov.
Sponsor: Radboud University Medical Center
Conditions: Parkinson Disease, Parkinsonism
Interventions: PD_Pal intervention
Countries: Austria, Estonia, Germany, Greece, Italy, Sweden, United Kingdom
Background: People with Parkinson's disease (PD), including parkinsonisms, experience complex motor and non-motor symptoms, which become more hindering in the advanced stages of PD. Advance care planning (ACP) enables individuals to define goals and preferences for future medical treatment and serves to ensure that people receive treatment and care that is in line with their preferences during serious chronic illness. The effectiveness of ACP for PD is currently unknown. Methods: The investigators will evaluate the effectiveness of a multicenter, open-label randomized controlled trial, with a parallel group design in seven European countries (Austria, Estonia, Germany, Greece, Italy, Sweden and United Kingdom). The "PD\_Pal intervention" comprises (1) several consultations with a trained nurse who will perform ACP conversations and support care coordination and (2) use of a patient-directed "Parkinson Support Plan-workbook". The intervention group will be compared to a care-as-usual group. Documented ACP-decisions in the medical records/patient's central file assessed at 6 months after baseline will be the primary endpoint. Secondary endpoints include patients' and family caregivers' quality of life, perceived care coordination, patients' symptom burden, and cost-effectiveness. Assessments will take place at baseline, 6 months after baseline and 12 months after baseline. In parallel, we will perform a process evaluation, to understand the feasibility of the intervention. Hypothesis: The investigators hypothesize that the PD\_Pal intervention will result in an increased number of participants with ACP documentation in the medical records/patient's central file, as compared to care-as-usual. Secondly, the investigators expect that, due to the PD\_Pal intervention, patients and their FC will experience better care coordination, better quality of life, a reduced patient symptom burden and the FC will experience a reduction in caregiver burden.
Sex: ALL
Healthy volunteers: Yes
Study type: INTERVENTIONAL
Inclusion criteria for people with Parkinson's disease: * Capable to participate , meaning that the subject is able to: * understand information about the decision * remember that information * use that information to make a decision * communicate their decision by talking, using sign language or any other means * Able to provide informed consent; * Meeting the MDS clinical diagnostic criteria for PD, including Parkinsonisms; * Hoehn \& Yahr ≥ 3; * Progressive deterioration in physical and/or cognitive function despite optimal therapy, according to the primary physician; and * Availability of a family caregiver or informal caregiver. Exclusion Criteria: * Inability to communicate independently, with or without supportive communication tools; - Unable or unwilling to commit to study procedures; * Presence of additional chronic medical illnesses which may require palliative services (e.g. metastatic cancer); * Already receiving palliative care or hospice services; * Already participating in a clinical study for palliative care. Inclusion criteria for family caregivers (FCs): * Identified by the patient as the person closest to them; * Willing to provide written informed consent; * Willing and able to complete questionnaires; * Aging ≥ 18 years. FC can only participate when the patient participates.
- Salzburg, Austria
- Tartu, Estonia
- Marburg, Germany
- Ioannina, Greece
- Padova, Italy
- Lund, Sweden
- London, United Kingdom